Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis

Authors

  • Dr. Md. Mizanur Rahman Junior Consultant, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Upazila Health Complex, Manda, Naogaon Author
  • Dr. A M Mohiuddin Junior Consultant, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 250 Beded district Sadar Hospital, Sherpur Author
  • Dr. Aashik Salauddin Junior Consultant, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Upazila Health Complex, Rupganj, Narayanganj Author
  • Dr. Tanzin Bin Kashem IMO, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka Author
  • Dr. Md. Shofiqul Islam Junior Consultant, Department of Paediatrics, Upazila Health Complex, Manda, Naogaon Author
  • Dr. Md. Abul Ahsan Junior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, Upazila Health Complex, Bagha, Rajshahi Author
  • Dr. Muhammad Ali Choudhary Junior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, Upazila Health Complex, Manda, Naogaon Author
  • Dr. Mustaq Ahmed Junior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, Upazila Health Complex, Nachole, Chapainawabganj Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjmsr.2024.v05i05.04

Keywords:

Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Instrumentation, Fusion Rates, Clinical Outcome

Abstract

Background: Spondylolisthesis, a prevalent source of low back pain, may require surgery after conservative treatment. Techniques like PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF have distinct benefits; PLIF, notably, provides stabilization and sagittal balance restoration via a single posterior approach. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis using cages and bone grafts. The study evaluated the impact of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion, and stabilization on patients' conditions. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January to December 2021, involving 21 patients who underwent the operative procedure. The analysis encompassed the influence of lumbar decompression, interbody fusion using bone graft with cages, and stabilization with pedicle screws and rods on lumbar Spondylolisthesis patients. Results: Out of 21 patients, 7(33.3%) were male and 14(66.7%) were female. The mean age was 46.90±13.7 years and range between 23-70 years. The most expected involved level is L4 over L5 17(81.0%). According to Meyerding's grading, grade II was 15(71.4%), and grade I was 6 (28.6%), according to types of Spondylolistheses lytic 12(57.1%), degenerative 8(38.1%), and dysplastic 1 (4.8%). Excellent outcomes were seen in 17(81.0%) cases and good results were found in 4(19.0%) cases. Probably not fused after surgery was observed in 2(9.5%) patients. The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index was 57.78±2.25, and the postoperative ODI was 16.56±3.53. Conclusion: Instrumented fusion demonstrated higher fusion rates and superior clinical outcomes, suggesting its efficacy in managing lumbar spondylolisthesis.

References

Rakesh, S. (2014). A Prospective study of short term clinical and radiological analysis of lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis (Doctoral dissertation, Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai).

García-Ramos, C. L., Valenzuela-González, J., Baeza-Álvarez, V. B., Rosales-Olivarez, L. M., Alpizar-Aguirre, A., & Reyes-Sánchez, A. (2021). Degenerative spondylolisthesis I: general principles. Acta ortopédica mexicana, 34(5), 324-328.

Aoki, Y., Takahashi, H., Nakajima, A., Kubota, G., Watanabe, A., Nakajima, T., ... & Ohtori, S. (2020). Prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 6739.

Hegde, D., Mehra, S., Babu, S., & Ballal, A. (2017). A study to assess the functional outcome of decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion of low grade spondylolisthesis of lumbar vertebra. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(3), RC01.

Litak, J., Czyzewski, W., Szymoniuk, M., Pastuszak, B., Litak, J., Litak, G., ... & Kamieniak, P. (2022). Hydroxyapatite use in spine surgery—molecular and clinical aspect. Materials, 15(8), 2906.

Vivek, K. (2020). Functional Outcome following Pedicle Screw Instrumentation and Fusion for Low Grade Lumbar Spinal Instability in Tertiary Care Hospital, Kanchipuram District (Doctoral dissertation, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kanchipuram).

Liu, J., Deng, H., Long, X., Chen, X., Xu, R., & Liu, Z. (2016). A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. European Spine Journal, 25, 1575-1580.

Alam, M. S., Karim, M. R., Islam, S. S., Roy, U. K., Sabuj, S. H., Alam, M., ... & Khan, K. M. H. Results of Posterior Interbody Fusion and Transpedicular Screws Fixation for the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis. The Journal of Bangladesh Orthopaedic Society (JBOS), 90.

Lin, Y., Chen, W., Chen, A., & Li, F. (2016). Comparison between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of clinical results and safety outcomes. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery, 77(01), 002-010.

Hossain, Q., Hossain, A., Nizum, M. Z., & Naser, S. B. (2024). Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Customer Relationship Management (CRM). International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 16(3), 653-663.

Saravanakumar, R., Maniraj, S. P., Barshan, A. D., Das, S., Hasan, H., & Alazzam, M. B. (2023, November). Clustering big data for novel health care system. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2587, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Khan, M. S., Rayhan, M. F., Harun, M. E., Rahaman, M. S., Naher, K., Khan, M. T., & Hasan, S. Z. (2023). Functional & Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Decompression & Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Using Cage and Bone Graft Combined with Stabilization in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Sch J App Med Sci, 9, 1723-1729.

Tye, E. Y., Tanenbaum, J. E., Alonso, A. S., Xiao, R., Steinmetz, M. P., Mroz, T. E., & Savage, J. W. (2018). Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5–S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. The Spine Journal, 18(3), 464-471.

Amin, M. R., Rahman, M. A., Khan, A. H., Devnath, H., Hossain, A. M., Hasan, M., & Barua, K. K. (2017). Posterior lumber interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation for the management of spondylolisthesis: An analysis of 40 cases. Age (Years), 21(30), 2.

Macki, M., Bydon, M., Weingart, R., Sciubba, D., Wolinsky, J. P., Gokaslan, Z. L., ... & Witham, T. (2015). Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 138, 117-123.

Hussain, M. D., Rahman, M. H., & Ali, N. M. (2024). Investigation of Gauss-Seidel Method for Load Flow Analysis in Smart Grids. Sch J Eng Tech, 5, 169-178.

Hasan, H., Rahman, M. H. ., Haque, M. A., Rahman, M. S. ., Ali, M. S. ., & Sultana, S. . (2024). Nutritional Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Focus on Renal Diet. Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Innovations, 1(1), 34-40.

Lara-Almunia, M., Gomez-Moreta, J. A., & Hernandez-Vicente, J. (2015). Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with instrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis: description and association of clinico-surgical variables with prognosis in a series of 36 cases. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 9.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Rahman, D. M. M., Dr. A M Mohiuddin, Salauddin, D. A. ., Kashem, D. T. B. ., Islam, D. M. S. ., Ahsan, D. M. A. ., Choudhary, D. M. A. ., & Ahmed, D. M. . (2024). Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Instrumentation in Spondylolisthesis. IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research, 5(5), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjmsr.2024.v05i05.04

Similar Articles

1-10 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.