eISSN: 2709-1902 / ISSN: 2709-1899
Register
Login
IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research
2022, Volume:3, No 2 : 1-6
Research Article
Tlics Score & Denis Scale and Their Association with Various Variables among Patients Undergoing Operative Treatment for the Thoraco-Lumbar Fracture at Tertiary Care Hospital
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
MS Orthopaedic Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India
2
Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India
Received
March 25, 2022
Revised
March 30, 2022
Accepted
April 5, 2022
Published
April 10, 2022
Abstract

Background: Present study to evaluate the TLICS score & Denis scale and their association with various variables among patients undergoing operative treatment for the thoraco-lumbar fracture with short segment stabilization of thoraco-lumbar spine with or without one screw fixation in fracture vertebrae. Methodology: The present study included both prospective and retrospective patients of thoraco-lumbar injury admitted, operated or came for follow up in Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla between May2019 to May 2020. They were divided in 2 groups; Group A included the patients with 4 screws while group B included the patients with 5 screws. Socio-demographic history was assessed and a thorough clinical & neurological examination was done for classification and other parameters. Results: A total of 108 patients with TLISS score of more than 4 were recruited in the study which include 44  retrospective patients while 64 patients were prospective. 28 patient’s fracture (Group A) were stabilized with 4 screw and 80 (Group B) were stabilized with 5 screws. There were 57 males and 51 females. Mean age was higher in group A (48.14 ± 4.35) as compare to group B (44.88±12.89). Group A had a mean TLICS of 5.03±0.51 and Group B with 5.26±0.71. Our study observed a significant association between TLICS score and pre-operative kyphotic angle. According to Denis scale, majority had occasional minimal pain with no need of medication & Returned to sedentary work, without weight restriction at 9 months of follow up. There was no significant association between age and Denis scale & between TLICS score and Denis scale. Conclusion: Present study concluded that majority of patients were males and aged above 50 years. There was no statistically difference according to TLICS & Denis scale in both groups. There was significant association between TLICS score and pre-operative kyphotic angle but not between age and Denis scale & between TLICS score and Denis scale.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Thoracolumbar injuries in trauma are concentrated at the thoracolumbar junction, with 60% occurring between T11 and L2vertebral level, and 10-14% involved the lower lumbar spine. About 20% patients with fracture atthoracolumbar level have associated neurological injury. Thoracolumbar injuries account for 30-50% of all injuries in spine. It is also the 2nd most common region after cervical spine injury.1,2

 

The Thorco-lumbar spine injuries are classified by various classification system like Denis system which classify it on the basis of stability and mechanism and thoraco-lumbar injury classification severity score (TLICS) which focussed on 3 key parameters to reflect the stability of disrupted spinal column namely the morphology of the injury; the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex; and the neurologic status of the patient.3-7

 

The aim of surgery in these fracture include decompression of the neural components, fracture reduction, and providing a rigid fixation, and rehabilitation of the patient. Short-segment spinal instrumentation has been beneficial in the management of thoraco-lumbar spinal fractures for better correction of kyphotic deformity with greater initial stability, early painless mobilization, and indirect decompression of the spinal canal. Despite the advantages of this approach, it is also associated with loss of reduction and instrumentation failure.8,9

 

Pedicle screw instrumentation provides less surgical exposure, correction of deformity and better stabilization of one motion segment above and below fracture. The combined screw fixation technique requires insertion of 1 screws into the fractured vertebrae, which can produce a forward driving force to enhance the reduction and reshaping and can be used to directly raise the end plate to assist in the restoration of the compressed vertebral height.8,9

 

The present study was designed to evaluate the TLICS score & Denis scale and their association with various variables among patients undergoing operative treatment for the thoraco-lumbar fracture with short segment stabilization of thoraco-lumbar spine with or without one screw fixation in fracture vertebrae.

 

AIMS & OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the TLICS score & Denis scale and their association with various variables among patients undergoing operative treatment for the thoraco-lumbar fracture with short segment stabilization of thoraco-lumbar spine with or without one screw fixation in fracture vertebrae.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Study Design- It was a Cross-sectional hospital based study. Study Area: The study was carried out in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. Study Duration- Between May 2019 to May 2020. Study Population: A total of 108 patients with TLISS score of more than 4 were recruited in the study which include 44 retrospective patients who were operated for thoraco-lumbar fracture within 2 years before May 2019 & came for the follow-up of in the OPD and 64 patients who were operated between May 2019 to May 2020. All the patients with stable thoracolumbar fracture, comorbidities, and multiple level fracture were not included in the study. Data Collection: Detailed socio-demographic history was assessed and clinical examination & neurological charting of all patients was done. Operating Procedure: A posterior midline incision was given cantering the affected vertebrae. Posterior elements were exposed subperiosteally by reflecting the erector spinae muscle laterally to the facet joint and just base of transverse processes distal to proximal, one level above and one level below the level of decompression. Point of insertion of screws was identified and cortical bone nibbled with a bone nibbler. A blunt awl was inserted into the pedicle and advanced through the pedicle. All the entry point were made where pedicular screws insertion were identified with probe. All the entry point checked with pedicular feeler for all four intact walls of pedicle (medial, lateral, superior & inferior).Adequate length and diameter screws are inserted as per direction and position of pedicular awl. Adequate length of rod selected and bend according to the curvature of spine. Rod was stabilised over the pedicular screw and blocker in top loading screw. Laminectomy was done in case where canal diameter is decreased more than one third and patient had neural deficit. Dural tear if found was repaired with 3-0 silk with continuous stitches. Gauge count was done before initiation of closure. Negative suction drain of 16 G was placed in the wound over the gel foam. Erector spinae muscle and overlying fascia was sutured. Superficial and thoracolumbar fascia closed meticulously. Injection vancomycin 1gm infiltrated locally in to wound. Subcutaneous sutures were applied. Negative suction secured with skin with No 1 silk cutting body. Skin staplers were applied. Post-operative routine lateral and anteroposterior radiograph were obtained to access the placement of pedicle screws and rods. Operation Definition: A) Denis Classification a) Functional pain scale according to Denis. Score Criteria of the pain scale 1: No pain 2: Minimal pain, without using medication 3: Moderate pain, with occasional use of medication 4: Moderate to severe pain, with constant use of medication 5: Severe pain, with chronic use of medication b) Functional work scale according to Denis. Score Criteria of the functional work scale 1: Returned to heavy work 2: Returned to sedentary work, without weight restriction 3: Returned to work, but changed activity 4: Returned to work, but only part-time 5: Incapable of working B) Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS):Parameter were a) Morphology: Morphology of the injury is divided into three patterns: • Compression o Wedge Compression Fracture: 1 Point o Burst Fracture: 2 Points • Translation/Rotation: 3 Points • Distraction: 4 Points b) Posterior Ligamentous Complex • Intact: 0 Points • Suspected Injury Or Indeterminate: 2 Points • Injured: 3 Points c) Neurologic Involvement • Intact: 0 Points • Nerve Root: 2 Points • Cord/Conus Medullaris (Incomplete): 3 Points • Cord/Conus Medullaris (Complete): 2 Points • Cauda Equina: 3 Points Statistical Analysis: Data was collected and entered in Microsoft excel spread sheet, cleaned for errors and analyzed with Epi Info V7 Software with appropriate statistical test in terms of frequencies, percentage, mean standard deviation etc. The comparison of continuous variables between the groups will be performed using student’s t test while categorical data between the groups were compared using chi square test. For all statistical tests, p value less than 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were recruited in the study. Group A included the patients with 4 screws while group B included the patients with 5 screws. Group A consisted of 28 patients while group B had 80 patients.. 10 patients (35.7 %) in group A and 54 (67.5%) patients in group B were prospective cases. In retrospective group, 18 cases were in group A and 26 (32.5 %) were in group B. The age range of the participants was from 16 to 78 years. 12 (42.8%) patients in group A and 30 (37.5%) in group B were aged above 50 years. In our study mean age was higher in group A (48.14 ± 4.35) as compare to group B (44.88±12.89), with range (22-78) in group A and (18-65) in group B. In our study there were total 57 males and 51 females. Males were higher in group A (n=19; 67.8%) while females were higher in group B (n=42; 52.5 %) (Table-1).

 

 

Table 1: Distribution of patients according to groups & Socio-demographic Variables

 

Group A : 4 screws

Group B : 5 screws (one intermediate screw)

No.

%

No.

%

Type of patients

Prospective

10

35.7

54

67.5

Retrospective

18

64.3

26

32.5

Age group

16-30 years

5

17.8

16

20

31-50 years

11

39.2

34

42.5

51-70 years

12

42.8

30

37.5

Mean Age

48.14±4.35

44.88±12.89

Gender

Male

19

67.8

38

47.5

Female

9

32.2

42

52.5

Total

28

100

80

108

           

 

 

Our study observed that mean TLICS score was comparable between group A (5.03±0.51) and group B (5.26±0.71) (p - 0.122). There was no difference in pain and work scale at 9-months between both groups according to Denis scale, However in this study group A 11 (39.3 %) and in group B 22 (27.5%) of patients had no pain, 50% in group A and 67.5 % in group B had occasional minimal pain with no need of medication, 10.7% in group A and 5.0% in group B had moderate pain with occasional need for medication. In group A 12 (42.8%) patients in group A and 27 (33.7%) in group B  were returned to heavy work, 11 (39.2%) patients in group A and 42(52.5%) in group B Returned to sedentary work, without weight restriction, 3 (10.7%) patients in group A and 9(11.2%) in group B Returned to work, but changed activity while 2 (7.3%) patients in group A and 2 (2.5%) in group B Returned to work, but only part-time at 9 months of follow up (Table-2).

 

 

Table 2: Comparison of TLICS score & Denis scale between both groups

Grading System

Group A (n=28)

Group B (n=80)

P value

No.

%

No.

%

TLICS score

5.04±0.51

5.26±0.71

0.122

Denis scale (9-months)

 

Denis Pain scale

 

P1

11

39.3

22

27.5

0.24

P2

14

50.0

54

67.5

0.09

P3

3

10.7

4

5.0

0.29

Denis Work scale

 

W1

12

42.8

27

33.7

0.38

W2

11

39.2

42

52.5

0.22

W3

3

10.7

9

11.2

1.0

W4

2

7.3

2

2.5

0.26

 

 

Our study observed a significant association between TLICS score and pre-operative kyphotic angle. In our study 64 patient presented with score of  5 and 31 patient  had TLICS score of 6 while 12 patient had  score of 4 & 1 patient  had  score of  8 (Table-3).

 

 

Table-3: Association between TLICS score and kyphotic angle in patients

TLICS score

11-20 degree (n=40)

21-30 degree (n=50)

>30 degree (n=18)

Total

P value

4

5 (41.7%)

7 58.3%)

0

12

0.045

5

20 (31.2%)

27 (42.2%)

17 (26.6%)

64

6

14 (45.2%)

16 (51.6%)

1 (3.2%)

31

8

1 (100.0%)

0

0

1

Grand Total

40

50

18

108

 

In our study there was no significant association between age and Denis scale (Table-4).

 

Table-4: Association of Age with Denis scale.

Denis scale (at follow-up)

16-30 years (n=21)

31-50 years (n=45)

51-70 years (n=42)

P value

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Denis Pain scale

P1

7

33.3

11

24.4

15

35.7

0.49

P2

13

61.9

31

68.9

24

57.1

0.90

P3

1

4.8

3

6.7

3

7.1

0.70

Denis Work scale

W1

4

19.0

18

40.0

17

40.5

0.19

W2

12

57.1

21

46.7

20

47.6

0.70

W3

4

19.0

4

8.9

4

9.5

0.43

W4

1

4.8

2

4.4

1

2.4

0.84

                 

 

In our study there was no significant association between TLICS score and Denis scale (Table-5).

 

Table-5: Association of TLICS score with Denis scale.

Denis scale

 (9-months follow up )

TLICS score

p value

4 (n=12)

5 (n=64)

6 (n=31)

8 (n=1)

Denis Pain scale

P1

9 (75.0%)

21 (32.8%)

3 (9.7%)

0

<0.01

P2

3 (25.0%)

40 (62.5%)

24 (77.4%)

1 (100.0%)

<0.01

P3

0

3 (4.7%)

4 (12.9%)

0

0.78

Denis Work scale

W1

7 (58.3%)

26 (40.6%)

6 (19.4%)

0

0.05

W2

5 (41.7%)

33 (51.6%)

14 (45.2%)

1 (100.0%)

0.64

W3

0

5 (7.8%)

7 (22.6%)

0

0.09

W4

0

0

4 (19.9%)

0

0.01

DISCUSSION

Present study included patients undergoing operative treatment for the thoracolumbar fracture in the Orthopaedics Department of Indra Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. Recruited patients had TLICS score of 4 or more and were operated with Pedicle Screw fixation which should be done as early as possible to help in good nursing care and mobilization of the patient and to prevent deterioration of the neurological status. Pedicle screw fixation via posterior approach which was the technique employed in the present study has been widely used for most thoracolumbar fractures owing to its three-column fixation and satisfactory clinical outcome as it provides adequate exposure and direct visualization.10-12

 

The mean age of the participants in the present study was (48.14±4.35) in group A and (44.88±12.89) in group B, in the studies in the past this has been seen that the age range of these kind of injuries is present in the range of 30 to 50 years, studies by Jei wei Tian et al13, Guven et al14, Farrokhi et al15, Butt M et al16, and have all findings similar to our study where the age is in the similar range. The reason of the age range can be attributed to the risk of accident involving RTA17 or impact injuries which is generally present in this age group. Similar assumption can be made about the sex distribution of the study group which shows a male pre-ponderance.

 

In our study of 108 patients, total 57 were males in both group A and Group B and 51 were females in both groups. Male were higher in group A (N=19) 67.8% while female were higher in group B (N= 42) 52.5%. The observation in the study are comparable to numerous studies established in literature, they include male preponderance & this reflect the fact that most outdoor activities are performed by male, so they are more prone for injuries.15-17

 

Our study observed that mean TLICS score was comparable between group A (5.03±0.51) and group B (5.26±0.71) (p - 0.122). TLICS Scale is a guideline for the management of thoracolumbar injuries. A composite injury severity score stratifying patients into operative and non-operative treatment.   It is used to assess integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, injury morphology, and neurological status of the patient. TILCS facilitates the communication between physicians, and guides to treatment decision with better outcome.18,19 Our study also observed a significant association between TLICS score and pre-operative kyphotic angle.

 

Denis scale was used to assess the pain and functionality of the patients after operation, there was no significant difference in the reduction of pain in the two groups, however, the functionality showed a marked regain in the post-operative period with majority of patients returning to their old job, few of the patients who were involved in heavy work were ergonomically relocated to the new job with less physical labour, such patients were 3 in the group A and 9 in group B. Previous study using the Denis scale also found that the pain reduction was not significantly different in the groups20,21. In our study there was no significant association between TLICS score and Denis scale.

CONCLUSION

Present study concluded that majority of patients were males and aged above 50 years. There was no statistically difference according to TLICS & Denis scale in both groups. There was significant association between TLICS score and pre-operative kyphotic angle but no significant association between age and Denis scale & between TLICS score and Denis scale

REFERENCES
  1. Liu L, Gan Y, Zhou Q, Wang H, Dai F, Luo F, Hou T, Zhang C, Zhao C, Zhang J, Xu J. Improved monosegment pedicle instrumentation for treatment of thoracolumbar incomplete burst fractures. BioMed Research International. 2015 May 4; 2015.
  2. Reier PJ. Cellular transplantation strategies for spinal cord injury and translational neurobiology. NeuroRx. 2004 Oct 1;1(4):424-51.
  3. Benson DR, Keenen TL. Evaluation and treatment of trauma to the vertebral column. Instructional course lectures. 1990 Jan 1;39:577-89.
  4. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. spine. 1983 Nov 1;8(8):817-31.
  5. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. European Spine Journal. 1994 Aug;3(4):184-201.
  6. Vaccaro AR, Lehman Jr RA, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine. 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2325-33.
  7. Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C. The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2005 Jun 1;18(3):209-15.
  8. Knoeller SM, Seifried C. Historical perspective: history of spinal surgery. Spine. 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2838-43.
  9. Heary RF, Madhavan K. The history of spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep 1;63(suppl_3):A5-15.
  10. Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Horton WC. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation. Journal of spinal disorders. 1994 Oct 1;7(5):402-7.
  11. Defino HL, Scarparo P. Fractures of thoracolumbar spine: monosegmental fixation. Injury. 2005 Jul 1;36(2):S90-7.
  12. Norton RP, Milne EL, Kaimrajh DN, Eismont FJ, Latta LL, Williams SK. Biomechanical analysis of four-versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. The Spine Journal. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1734-9.
  13. Tian JW, Wang L, Xia T, Liu CY, Zhao QH, Dong SH. Posterior short-segmental fixation combined with intermediate screws vs conventional intersegmental fixation for monosegmental thoracolumbar fractures. Orthopedics. 2011 Aug 8;34(8):e389-96.
  14. Guven O, Kocaoglu B, Bezer M, Aydin N, Nalbantoglu U. The use of screw at the fracture level in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2009 Aug 1;22(6):417-21.
  15. Farrokhi MR, Razmkon A, Maghami Z, Nikoo Z. Inclusion of the fracture level in short segment fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. European spine journal. 2010 Oct;19(10):1651-6.
  16. Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir B, Dhar AS, Hussain A, Mumtaz M. Management of unstable thoracolumbar spinal injuries by posterior short segment spinal fixation. International orthopaedics. 2007 Apr;31(2):259-64.
  17. Balain B, Lal H. Spinal trauma. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics & Trauma. 2017 Apr 1;8(2):97-8.
  18. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2172540-overview (Accessed on 13 March 2022)
  19. Pneumaticos SG, Karampinas PK, Triantafilopoulos G, Koufos S, Polyzois V, Vlamis J. Evaluation of TLICS for thoracolumbar fractures. European spine journal. 2016 Apr;25(4):1123-7.
  20. Kim BG, Dan JM, Shin DE. Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Asian spine journal. 2015 Feb;9(1):133.
  21. Kapoen C, Liu Y, Bloemers FW, Deunk J. Pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: conventional short segment versus short segment with intermediate screws at the fracture level—a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Spine Journal. 2020 Oct;29(10):2491-504.
License
Copyright (c) IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IARJMSR open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Recommended Articles
Correlation between Thyroid Dysfunction and Glycemic Status in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
8-13
PDF
Clinical Presentation and Endocrine Profile of Women Diagnosed with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Setting
22-28
PDF
Bacteriological Study of Bile in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy for Chronic Calculous Cholecystitis
14-21
PDF
Relationship Neonatal Hyper Bilirubinaemia with TSH -An Observational Study
1-6
PDF
IAR Journal of Medicine and Surgery Research
+91-9707682512
+91-9707682512
support@jmsrp.or.ke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license. Open Access Publication.
Copyright © International Academic Research Consortium. All rights reserved.
|
|
|